Which ethical principle in NRP is consistent with practices for resuscitating older children or adults?

The correct answer is that the same ethical principles apply. In the context of neonatal resuscitation, as well as resuscitation practices for older children or adults, several core ethical principles are consistently upheld. These principles include the importance of beneficence (acting in the best interest of the patient), non-maleficence (avoiding harm), autonomy (respecting the decisions and rights of patients and their families), and justice (ensuring fairness in care).

By stating that the same ethical principles apply, it emphasizes that the decision-making processes around resuscitation, regardless of the age of the patient, are guided by these fundamental ethical considerations. This consistency is crucial in maintaining quality care, ensuring that patients receive appropriate treatment based on their unique medical circumstances while also respecting their dignity and rights.

Focusing on parental consent as a standalone principle does not encompass the broader ethical considerations that guide resuscitation efforts across different age groups. Standardized treatment regardless of age may overlook the individual needs and responses of patients, which can vary significantly between newborns and older individuals. Lastly, a focus on minimizing costs does not align with the ethical commitment to provide the best possible care, which should not be compromised by financial considerations.