Which of the following best describes the physician's role if there is no chance for survival?

The physician's role in a situation where there is no chance for survival is to consider the ethical implications of initiating resuscitation efforts. When it is determined that resuscitation would not benefit the infant and is unlikely to result in a quality of life or meaningful survival, it becomes ethically appropriate to refrain from starting resuscitation efforts.

This decision aligns with the principles of beneficence and non-maleficence in medical ethics, which emphasize doing good for the patient and avoiding harm. Initiating resuscitation in such circumstances could lead to unnecessary suffering for both the infant and the family. Thus, not offering resuscitation as an ethical option ensures that the care provided is appropriate and compassionate, focusing on the best interests of the infant in a terminal condition.

In situations where resuscitation is deemed futile, discussions about the infant's condition and potential outcomes should occur, but the initiation of resuscitative measures would not be warranted.