Which statement is true regarding newborn resuscitation?

The statement regarding prolonged lack of perfusion leading to organ damage is accurate and stands out as true in the context of newborn resuscitation. In neonates, effective blood circulation is critical to delivering oxygen and nutrients to vital organs. When a newborn experiences a lack of perfusion, there is an insufficient supply of oxygenated blood, which can quickly result in cellular injury and potential organ dysfunction. This is particularly crucial given that newborns have unique physiological needs and are more vulnerable to injury from hypoxia or ischemia, emphasizing the urgency of addressing perfusion issues during resuscitation.

In contrast to this statement, it is not typical for most newborns to require chest compressions; in fact, the majority of newborns can be stabilized with less invasive interventions. While the resuscitation process can sometimes be straightforward, there are complexities involved, especially with distressed infants. Additionally, resuscitation cannot be delayed for assessment, as immediate action is necessary to prevent lasting damage during critical moments when signs of life are diminished.